Everything below is real ActReady output for a fictional example company. We don't have customer logos to show you, so instead here's the actual product: what the classifier returns, what the obligation tracker looks like, and what a generated document reads like.
Sample compliance report
The scenario: TalentSift (fictional), a 12-person startup selling an AI tool that screens CVs and ranks candidates for mid-size companies hiring in Germany and France.
1. Classification result
Annex III, point 4(a) — Employment
Your AI system is high-risk under the EU AI Act
AI systems intended to be used for the recruitment or selection of natural persons — in particular to place targeted job advertisements, analyse and filter job applications, and evaluate candidates — are listed in Annex III, point 4(a). Because TalentSift filters and ranks job applications, it falls squarely in this category. As the company that develops and sells the system, TalentSift is a provider with the full set of high-risk obligations.
Compliance deadline
December 2, 2027
Also applies
Article 50 — Aug 2, 2026
The classifier asks 7 questions and takes about 5 minutes. Try it with your own system — free, no signup.
2. Obligation tracker
High-risk classification generates these 10 obligations automatically. Each one has guidance, an owner, and a status — this is TalentSift three weeks in:
3. Generated document — excerpt
ActReady generates eight document types per system, from Annex IV technical documentation to transparency notices. Here's the opening of TalentSift's generated Human Oversight Plan (Article 14):
1. Purpose and scope
This document describes the human oversight measures implemented for the TalentSift CV Screening system pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. It covers the oversight mechanisms built into the product, the responsibilities assigned to deployer personnel, and the conditions under which the system's outputs must be reviewed or overridden by a human.
2. Oversight model
TalentSift operates on a human-in-the-loop model. The system ranks and annotates candidates but does not reject any application automatically. Every shortlisting decision requires explicit confirmation by a recruiter. The interface displays, for each ranked candidate: (a) the match score and its three highest-weighted factors, (b) a confidence indicator, and (c) a one-click control to override the ranking with a documented reason…
— continues for 6 more sections covering overseer competence requirements, automation bias safeguards, intervention procedures, logging, and review cadence
Documents are generated from your system's actual classification and answers, then exported as Word or PDF for your records or a conformity assessment.